Article page

Article information

Article`s title

The Coordinating Role of the Court in the Implementation of Conciliation Procedures: a Theoretical Aspect

Authors

A. Fomin 1

Volume

1 (2025)

Keywords

coordinating legal activity, conciliation procedures, functions and tasks of the judiciary, civil procedure, procedural-legal mechanism, conflict resolution, judicial conciliation, alternative method of conflict resolution.

Abstract

The ability to resolve a dispute at the sole discretion of the parties to a legal conflict through conciliation procedures with coordinating assistance in achieving a mutually acceptable consensus is one of the manifestations of the dispositive principles of self-regulation and autonomy of civil society. From a theoretical and legal point of view, the article examines the procedural and legal mechanism for the implementation and features of the coordinating role of the court and its legal acts when using alternative dispute resolution methods (conciliation procedures), primarily in the private legal sphere. In comparison with the traditional procedure of judicial protection, conciliation procedures have a number of advantages: they allow resolving differences between conflicting parties independently with the coordinating role of the court, simplifying the consideration of disputes, contributing to the implementation of the principle of procedural economy, and increasing the legitimacy of the judiciary.

How to Cite this article

Фомин А.А. Координационная роль суда при осуществлении примирительных процедур: теоретический аспект // Право: история и современность. 2025. Т. 9, № 1. С. 32 – 40. doi: 10.17277/pravo.2025.01.pp.032-040

Download

(всего загрузок:22)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17277/pravo.2025.01.pp.032-040

🗏

032-040

Views:

15