Article information
Article`s title
Legal Features of Conducting Forensic Construction and Technical Expertise
Authors
A. Kuznetsov 1,
V. Babkin 2,
E. Repnikova 3
1 - Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
2 - Lipetsk State Technical University
3 - Tambov State Technical University; Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Volume
1 (
2026)
Keywords
construction and technical expertise,
procedural legislation,
special knowledge,
skills,
expert opinion,
legal regulation of conducting an expert examination. Abstract
Often, civil or criminal proceedings require special knowledge in a particular field of expertise, which has a complex structure and includes interconnected elements, subsystems, and areas of expertise. This includes construction and technical expertise, which cannot be understood without understanding the legal regulation of this institution of forensic expertise, as well as the rational and correct use of procedural norms. In law enforcement practice, there is often a situation where an expert study is required as part of construction activities. It is important not only to conduct a high-quality expert study, but also to document its results, which will be used to draw conclusions about significant legal facts relevant to resolving the dispute. The quality of the construction and technical expert study also depends on the questions that are posed to the expert. Additionally, many procedural and methodological issues have not yet been resolved. These factors contribute to the relevance of this study. The purpose of this article is not only to identify the legal features of conducting construction and technical expertise, but also to consider the main areas of cooperation between legal and construction specialists for the qualified conduct of this type of expert research.
How to Cite this article
Кузнецов А. А., Бабкин В. И., Репникова Э. Ю. Правовые особенности проведения судебной строительно-технической экспертизы // Право: история и современность. – 2026. – Т. 10, № 1. – С. 080 – 090. doi: 10.17277/pravo.2026.01.pp.080-090
Download
(всего загрузок:39)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17277/pravo.2026.01.pp.080-090
🗏
080-090
Views:
77
About authors
1
A. Kuznetsov
| Firstname | A. |
| Middlename | A. |
| Lastname | Kuznetsov |
| Position | Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Higher School of Law and Forensic Engineering |
| Organization | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University |
| ORCID | |
| Scopus ID | |
2
V. Babkin
| Firstname | V. |
| Middlename | I. |
| Lastname | Babkin |
| Position | Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Professor |
| Organization | Lipetsk State Technical University |
| ORCID | |
| Scopus ID | |
3
E. Repnikova
| Firstname | E. |
| Middlename | Yu. |
| Lastname | Repnikova |
| Position | D. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of International Law; Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Procedure |
| Organization | Tambov State Technical University; Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin |
| ORCID | |
| Scopus ID | |
